As many as 207 websites have been infected with malicious code designed to launch a cryptocurrency miner by leveraging WebAssembly (Wasm) on the browser.
Web security company Sucuri, which published details of the campaign, said it launched an investigation after one of its clients had their computer slowed down significantly every time upon navigating to their own WordPress portal.
“Once decoded, the contents of auto.js immediately reveal the functionality of a cryptominer which starts mining when a visitor lands on the compromised site,” Sucuri malware researcher Cesar Anjos said.
What’s more, the deobfuscated auto.js code makes use of WebAssembly to run low-level binary code directly on the browser.
The actor-controlled domain, wm.bmwebm[.]org, is said to have been registered in January 2021, implying the infrastructure continued to remain active for more than 1.5 years without attracting any attention.
“This functionality also makes it possible for the bad actor to inject the scripts in multiple locations on the compromised website and still maintain the appearance that injections ‘belong’ within the environment,” Anjos noted.
Setting aside the fact that Wasm’s binary format makes detection and analysis by conventional antivirus engines more challenging, the technique could open the door to more sophisticated browser-based attacks such as e-skimming that can fly under the radar for extended periods of time.
Complicating matters further is the lack of integrity checks for Wasm modules, effectively making it impossible to determine if an application has been tampered with.
To help illustrate the security weaknesses of WebAssembly, a 2020 study by a group of academics from the University of Stuttgart and Bundeswehr University Munich unearthed security issues that could be used to write to arbitrary memory, overwrite sensitive data, and hijack control flow.
Subsequent research published in November 2021 based on a translation of 4,469 C programs with known buffer overflow vulnerabilities to Wasm found that “compiling an existing C program to WebAssembly without additional precautions may hamper its security.”
In a similar vein, a follow-up investigation that involved compiling 17,802 C programs exhibiting known weaknesses to 64-bit x86 and to WebAssembly binaries uncovered that 4,911 differed in outcome when their WebAssembly and their x86 binary is executed, either by printing different output, or by differing in their return code.
“Compiling an existing C program to WebAssembly for cross-platform distribution may require source code adaptations; otherwise, the security of the WebAssembly application may be at risk,” the researchers said.
To counter such scenarios where classical code flaws are transferred over from the original programs down to the cross-compiled Wasm binaries, academics from the Universidade de Lisboa released a static vulnerability scanner called Wasmati to identify issues in Wasm binaries.